Kenneth Mr. Vercammen was included in the 2020 “Super Lawyers” list published by Thomson Reuters.

To schedule a confidential consultation, email us at VercammenAppointments@NJlaws.com, call or visit www.njlaws.com

(732) 572-0500

Saturday, April 30, 2011

ESTATE OF NANCY Z. PALEY VS. BANK OF AMERICA (f/k/a FLEET BANK, f/k/a FIRST JERSEY BANK, f/k/a WESTMINSTER BANK, f/k/a SUMMIT BANK), ET AL. A-4391-07T

ESTATE OF NANCY Z. PALEY VS. BANK OF AMERICA (f/k/a

FLEET BANK, f/k/a FIRST JERSEY BANK, f/k/a WESTMINSTER

BANK, f/k/a SUMMIT BANK), ET AL.

A-4391-07T3, A-5519-07T3, A-5864-07T3 (CONSOLIDATED)

We held that the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) does not apply to

a claim by a bank depositor for payment by the bank of multiple

checks presented to and paid by it to the depositor's medical

aide. We held that the CFA provides no remedy to the depositor

when a bank adopts a check presentation and clearance procedure

consistent with the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC),

specifically Articles 3 and 4 of the UCC, N.J.S.A. 12A:3-101 to

-605 and 4-101 to -504, has acted in conformity with those

procedures, and does not have an agreement with the depositor

that creates a special relationship with duties beyond those

imposed by the UCC. 04-29-11