Kenneth Mr. Vercammen was included in the 2020 “Super Lawyers” list published by Thomson Reuters.

To schedule a confidential consultation, email us at VercammenAppointments@NJlaws.com, call or visit www.njlaws.com

(732) 572-0500

Saturday, April 30, 2011

DOVER-CHESTER ASSOCIATES, ETC. VS. RANDOLPH TOWNSHIP AND RANDOLPH TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES, L.P. ET AL. VS. RANDOLPH TOWNSHIP (CONSOLIDATED) A-3445-09T3

DOVER-CHESTER ASSOCIATES, ETC. VS. RANDOLPH TOWNSHIP

AND RANDOLPH TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES, L.P. ET AL. VS.

RANDOLPH TOWNSHIP (CONSOLIDATED)

A-3445-09T3, A-3446-09T3

These appeals from the judgment of a county board of

taxation to the Tax Court are governed by N.J.S.A. 54:51A-1(b),

which requires that all taxes due for the year for which review

is sought must have been paid "[a]t the time that a complaint

has been filed with the Tax Court[.]" In contrast, direct

appeals to the Tax Court and initial appeals to a county board

of taxation are governed by N.J.S.A. 54:3-27, which requires the

appealing taxpayer to pay all taxes due, up to and including the

first quarter of the taxes assessed against him for the current

tax year. However, because N.J.S.A. 54:3-27 does not specify

when such payment must be made, we have found the requirement

satisfied when payment is made by the return date of a motion to

dismiss the appeal. The Legislature amended the statutes in

1999, adding provisions that permitted the relaxation of the tax

payment requirements in the "interests of justice" but did not

define that term. As we have not previously considered the

application of that provision and a conflict has arisen in

decisions in the Tax Court, we address the question whether

relaxation is required in the "interests of justice" under

N.J.S.A. 54:51A-1(b) if the tax obligation is satisfied before

the return date of a motion to dismiss its complaint. We

conclude that it is not. 04-20-11