This appeal arises out of an action challenging the suspension of a company that had been providing towing services in a municipality. As a matter of first impression, the court holds that the company had limited constitutional due process rights when it was suspended from the Township's towing lists. The court also holds that plaintiff received the process due its limited property interest. In addition, the court rejected plaintiff's arguments that its suspension from the towing lists violated its constitutional substantive due process and equal protection rights. Consequently, the court affirmed the summary judgment dismissal of plaintiff's claims against the Township, its police chief, and one of its police officers.
