KEYKO GIL, ET AL. VS. CLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER, ET
AL.
A-4034-14T4
In this appeal, the court examined clauses contained in insurance policies covering a hospital to determine, among other things, whether the trial judge erred in rejecting plaintiffs' arguments that an allegedly negligent physician was also covered
A-4034-14T4
In this appeal, the court examined clauses contained in insurance policies covering a hospital to determine, among other things, whether the trial judge erred in rejecting plaintiffs' arguments that an allegedly negligent physician was also covered
because he was the hospital's "employee" or a "leased worker,"
or because his limited liability company was "affiliated or
associated" with the hospital. The court held that the policy
language could not be plausibly interpreted to provide coverage
to the physician or his limited liability company, and affirmed
the summary judgment entered in favor of the insurers.
Judge Ostrer filed a concurring opinion.
