JANELLE BRUGALETTA VS. CALIXTO GARCIA, D.O., ET AL.
A-4342-15T1
In this interlocutory appeal, the court reverses the trial
court's order piercing the self-critical analysis privilege
under the Patient Safety Act, N.J.S.A. 26:2H-12.25(g). The
trial court pierced the privilege because defendant hospital
failed to report to plaintiff or the Department of Health that
plaintiff suffered a "serious preventable adverse event" (SPAE),
see N.J.S.A. 26:2H-12.25(a) as the Act required. See N.J.S.A.
26:2H-12.25(c), -12.25(d). In reversing, the appellate panel
holds that the self-critical analysis privilege is conditioned
solely on compliance with statutory and regulatory mandates
governing formation of a patient safety plan and related
procedural requirements. N.J.S.A. 26:2H-12.25(g). Furthermore,
there was insufficient evidence of causation to support the
trial court's finding of a SPAE. Specifically missing was
expert evidence that any serious adverse event occurred "because
of an error or other system failure." N.J.S.A. 26:2H-12.25(a).