TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY RAIL CORPORATION, ET AL. V.
THE NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION, ET AL.
A-0975-10T3
In this interlocutory appeal we address in a plenary and de
novo fashion the question of attorney disqualification in the
context of successive representation under Rule of Professional
Conduct 1.9. In so doing, we affirm the denial of the motion
for disqualification because the side-switching law firm was not
shown to be engaged in a present representation that is
substantially related to its former representation, within the
principles of City of Atlantic City v. Trupos, 201 N.J. 447
(2010). 02-03-11
