Kenneth Mr. Vercammen was included in the 2020 “Super Lawyers” list published by Thomson Reuters.

To schedule a confidential consultation, email us at VercammenAppointments@NJlaws.com, call or visit www.njlaws.com

(732) 572-0500

Showing posts with label RICHARD WALKER. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RICHARD WALKER. Show all posts

Sunday, April 10, 2016

RICHARD WALKER, ET AL. VS. COSTCO WHOLESALE WAREHOUSE A-2493-14T2

RICHARD WALKER, ET AL. VS. COSTCO WHOLESALE WAREHOUSE 
A-2493-14T2 

In this slip-and-fall case, we hold that the trial court erred in rejecting plaintiff's request to charge the jury with mode-of-operation liability principles under Model Civil Jury Charge 5.20F(11). Plaintiff presented a reasonable factual basis for a jury to find that what he perceived to be a "white, yogurt-based substance" on the floor of defendant's warehouse store came from a self-service display stand offering cups of free cheesecake. On retrial, the court should specifically include in its charge an instruction that the defendant is not liable under mode-of-operation principles unless the jury finds that the food offered at the self-service display was the source of the substance on which plaintiff slipped. 

Sunday, April 3, 2016

RICHARD WALKER, ET AL. VS. COSTCO WHOLESALE WAREHOUSE A-2493-14T2

RICHARD WALKER, ET AL. VS. COSTCO WHOLESALE WAREHOUSE 
A-2493-14T2 

In this slip-and-fall case, we hold that the trial court erred in rejecting plaintiff's request to charge the jury with mode-of-operation liability principles under Model Civil Jury Charge 5.20F(11). Plaintiff presented a reasonable factual basis for a jury to find that what he perceived to be a "white, yogurt-based substance" on the floor of defendant's warehouse store came from a self-service display stand offering cups of free cheesecake. On retrial, the court should specifically include in its charge an instruction that the defendant is not liable under mode-of-operation principles unless the jury finds that the food offered at the self-service display was the source of the substance on which plaintiff slipped.