Sunday, July 31, 2016
Karen K. Johnson v. Roselle EZ Quick, LLC (A-33-14; 075044)
Karen K. Johnson v. Roselle EZ Quick, LLC (A-33-14;
The 2011 amendment to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 does not expressly or implicitly present any of the factors necessary to rebut the presumption that, as a newly enacted law, it should be applied prospectively. Consequently, the amendment does not apply to plaintiff’s claims for personal injuries. The trial court therefore properly granted GEICO’s motion for summary judgment on its claim for reimbursement of the PIP benefits that it paid to plaintiff.