Kenneth Mr. Vercammen was included in the 2017 “Super Lawyers” list published by Thomson Reuters.

To schedule a confidential consultation, email us at VercammenAppointments@NJlaws.com, call or visit www.njlaws.com

(732) 572-0500

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCYVS. C.W. I/M/O I.N.W. A-0542-12T4


NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCYVS. C.W. I/M/O I.N.W.   A-0542-12T4
We address the requisite procedures Family Part judges must follow to protect a defendant's due process rights when a child's testimony is sought in a protective services action. We hold that in any proceeding filed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.21(c), when a defendant objects to utilizing an alternative to the child's in-court testimony, the judge must adhere to the statutory procedures outlined in N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-32.4, prior to allowing in camera testimony of a child-witness. 03/27/14