Kenneth Mr. Vercammen was included in the 2020 “Super Lawyers” list published by Thomson Reuters.

To schedule a confidential consultation, email us at VercammenAppointments@NJlaws.com, call or visit www.njlaws.com

(732) 572-0500

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

MARY E. CAIN AND JAMES D. CAIN V. MERCK & CO., INC. f/k/a SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION A-2138-08T2

MARY E. CAIN AND JAMES D. CAIN V. MERCK & CO., INC.

f/k/a SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION

A-2138-08T2 08-17-10

We construe N.J.S.A. 14A:5-28(4) of the New Jersey Business

Corporate Act as allowing shareholders with a proper purpose to

inspect the minutes of the board of directors and executive

committee. However, this right of inspection is limited to

those portions of the minutes that are pertinent to the

shareholder's proper purpose and should not be confused with a

discovery order. Further, unsubstantiated allegations of

mismanagement do not constitute a proper purpose; rather, a

shareholder who asserts investigation of mismanagement as a

proper purpose must come forward with specific, supported and

credible allegations of mismanagement in order to be entitled to

the inspection.